Focus Groups Are Dead—And You're Wasting Your Money If You Still Use Them
The Future of Market Research: AI-Driven Sentiment Analysis Replaces Traditional Focus Groups
This morning, I was at a conference when a woman who runs a group I support proudly announced that her team had spent over $100,000 on focus groups to develop a message aimed at persuading women. I had to stop myself from shaking my head—what a complete waste of money.
Not because targeting women voters is a bad idea—it’s essential. But because the money and time wasted on an outdated, overpriced method could have been put to far better use.
The reality is this: focus groups are a relic of the past. Once the gold standard for campaigns, corporate marketing, and public affairs, compared to modern methods they’re slow, expensive, and dangerously misleading. Worse (for those still doing focus groups), the world has moved on—and so should you.
If you want to truly understand what people think, you don’t need to herd 10-12 people into a room, pay them, guide them with a moderator, and hope they don’t just say what they think you want to hear or play follow the leader (loudest person). Instead, you can analyze millions of real-world conversations in real time through sentiment analysis—for a fraction of the cost and with far greater accuracy.
Let’s break down why focus groups are dead and what you should be doing instead.
The Big Problems with Focus Groups
For decades, focus groups were a staple of research, helping campaigns and companies test messages and refine strategies. But in today’s landscape, they suffer from three fatal flaws:
1. They’re Too Slow
A campaign or corporate brand doesn’t have weeks (or even months) to run expensive focus groups and sift through transcripts for insights. Meanwhile, public sentiment is shifting daily. By the time you get your results, the conversation has already changed.
Sentiment analysis, on the other hand, gives you insights in real time. Want to know how suburban women feel about a candidate’s abortion stance? You don’t need a focus group—you need AI scanning millions of social media posts, forum discussions, and online articles for the answer.
2. They’re Artificial and Unreliable
Focus groups are not the real world. They take place in controlled environments where a handful of people are acutely aware they’re being watched, paid, and asked to provide "insight."
This leads to social desirability bias—people saying what they think the moderator wants to hear instead of what they truly believe. It also enables group think, where a few dominant voices steer the discussion, drowning out real diversity of thought.
Contrast this with sentiment analysis, which pulls data from what people actually say online, in their own words, when they don’t think anyone is watching. No moderators. No artificial environments. Just raw, unfiltered sentiment.
3. They’re Absurdly Expensive
Let’s talk about cost. A single focus group with travel and participant incentives can run $10,000 to $15,000, and that’s just for one group. A full study, with multiple demographics across different regions, can easily exceed $100,000—as I was reminded this morning.
Meanwhile, a well-run sentiment analysis operation using AI-driven tools costs a fraction of that (often $3,000 to $5,000) and processes millions of data points instead of just 10-12 people in a room.
Which would you trust?
What You Should Be Doing Instead
If you want to replace focus groups with something faster, more accurate, and more cost-effective, here’s what you should do:
Leverage Sentiment Analysis for Real-Time Insights
Use AI to analyze social media, news articles, and forums.
Identify key shifts in public opinion as they happen, not weeks later.
Use Behavioral Data, Not Just Self-Reported Opinions
Instead of asking a small group how they feel, track what real voters or consumers are actually doing and saying.
For campaigns: Monitor what issues voters engage with, not just what they claim in a group setting.
For businesses: Track real customer reviews, engagement, and purchase behavior instead of relying on staged discussions.
Adopt Predictive Analytics for Strategy
Sentiment analysis doesn’t just tell you what people think today—it can predict where opinion is going.
This is how political campaigns win elections and how brands stay ahead of the competition.
Who’s Already Doing This?
The smartest campaigns and brands have already moved beyond focus groups:
Political Campaigns: The most successful modern campaigns have used AI-driven sentiment analysis to adjust messaging in real time, rather than relying on outdated focus group reports.
Corporate Marketing: Major companies now use AI tools to scan consumer sentiment and tweak ad campaigns within hours, not months.
Advocacy & Public Affairs: Groups pushing ballot initiatives or public policy changes have found social listening far more effective at capturing the true mood of the electorate.
If you’re still relying on focus groups, you’re playing by yesterday’s rules.
Final Word: Don’t Waste Your Money
That $100,000 spent on focus groups this morning? It could have been used to analyze millions of real-world data points, identify message resonance in real time, and adapt instantly. And probably had over $90,000 left over to communicate to voters!
Focus groups are a relic—a slow, expensive, and misleading tool that no longer fits today’s fast-moving political and business environment.
If you want to win—whether in politics, marketing, or public affairs—it’s time to move on.
What’s Next?
Are you still using focus groups? Thinking about shifting to sentiment analysis? I’d love to hear your thoughts—drop a comment below or shoot me a message.
And if you want to learn more about how AI is transforming research and strategy, make sure to subscribe.